Snag
The AI court for petty disputes.
Too small for therapy. Too dumb to drop.
SAMPLE CASE · REAL ENGINE OUTPUT
ROOMMATES
The thermostat incident
He set it to 67. She has a blanket fort and a grudge. Both filed.
PICK YOUR JUDGE — SAME FACTS, DIFFERENT COURTROOM
The Great Thermostat War of 2026: When Roommates Battle Over Seven Degrees and Basic Human Decency
Filer: Spite Temperature Vigilante · Sam: Midnight Thermostat Ninja
The court sees two freezing roommates who have turned their shared living space into a climate control cold war, each secretly sabotaging the thermostat while righteously condemning the other for identical behavior. You're both guilty of thermostat espionage — Sam's midnight temperature raids don't become virtuous because they save seventeen cents on utilities, and your spite-cranking to 74 degrees was the household equivalent of setting money on fire just to watch Sam's soul leave his body. This isn't about seven degrees or electric bills; this is about two adults who would rather wage psychological warfare than spend thirty seconds negotiating a number that falls between 67 and 74. The court is disappointed.
Sentence: You will both establish a compromise temperature of 70 degrees, install a 'thermostat modification log' where any changes require written justification and duration, or forfeit their right to complain about utility bills for the remainder of the lease
“This is about two adults who would rather wage psychological warfare than spend thirty seconds negotiating a number that falls between 67 and 74.”
See: Martinez v. Chen (2026) — 'The Great HVAC Sabotage Accord'
File yours. Two minutes.
Coming soon to the App Store. Leave an email, skip the line.
FROM THE DOCKET · SAMPLE RULINGS
ALSO ON THE SHELF
Group play on the big screen → heysnag.tv